{"id":8184,"date":"2022-07-04T16:52:41","date_gmt":"2022-07-04T13:52:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.efeshukuk.com\/?p=8184"},"modified":"2022-07-04T16:53:20","modified_gmt":"2022-07-04T13:53:20","slug":"dugun-takilerinin-paylastirilmasi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/efeshukuk.com\/en\/dugun-takilerinin-paylastirilmasi\/","title":{"rendered":"Distribution of Wedding Gifts"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\"D\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn
Distribution of Wedding Gifts<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

D\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn Tak\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n Payla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 – \u0130zmir Bo\u015fanma Avukat\u0131<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Who owns the wedding jewelry?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Bo\u015fanma s\u00fcre\u00e7lerinde en s\u0131k kar\u015f\u0131la\u015f\u0131lan sorulardan biri tak\u0131lar\u0131n hangi tarafa ait oldu\u011fudur. Yarg\u0131tay’\u0131n bu konuda vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu yerle\u015fmi\u015f i\u00e7tihatlar incelendi\u011finde bu konuda kararlar\u0131n istikrarl\u0131 oldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclecektir. Kararlarda d\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn s\u0131ras\u0131nda tak\u0131lan ziynet e\u015fyalar\u0131n\u0131n kad\u0131na ait oldu\u011fu ve kad\u0131n\u0131n ki\u015fisel e\u015fyas\u0131 niteli\u011finde oldu\u011fu ifade edilmektedir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Proof of the Jewelry<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

According to the fundamental principles and procedural rules of our legal system, in a lawsuit, the person who derives a favorable outcome from the facts of the case bears the burden of proof. To prove the validity of wedding gifts, any kind of evidence such as witness testimonies, photographs, and videos can be used.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Statute of Limitations for Requesting the Return of Jewelry<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

If no request has been made for the return of the jewelry Turkish Code of Obligations <\/a>Within this scope, this request must be fulfilled within 10 (ten) years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Relevant Supreme Court Decisions<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Bo\u015fanmada d\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn tak\u0131lar\u0131 kad\u0131na aittir. Bo\u015fanma halinde geri verme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc yoktur. Mahkemenin davay\u0131 kabul gerek\u00e7esi olaya ve i\u00e7tihatlara uygun de\u011fildir. \u015eu durumda, e\u015fyalar\u0131n geri al\u0131nmas\u0131 i\u00e7in bir neden olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re davan\u0131n reddi gerekirken yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde kabul edilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015ftir.  (Yarg\u0131tay 4. Hukuk Dairesi E. 2002\/10498K. 2003\/770T. 27.1.2003)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to Article 1 of the Civil Code, the judge has the authority to decide according to custom and tradition in cases where there is no provision in the law. Since the parties can prove the contrary of the presumption of possession with any kind of evidence, determining custom and tradition is important here. If there is a well-established custom and tradition in the region where the parties reside, followed by everyone without exception, that the jewelry given at the wedding, regardless of who gave it as a gift, belongs to the bride, then the woman should be considered the legal holder. It is incorrect to decide, without considering this aspect and without investigating custom and tradition, that the jewelry given to the husband during the wedding belongs to the husband and to order its return from the woman, based on an incomplete investigation. (Supreme Court of Appeals, 2nd Civil Chamber, Case No. 1995\/10121, Decision No. 1995\/11061, Date: October 26, 1995)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As a rule, jewelry given during a wedding ceremony, regardless of who gives it to whom, is considered a gift to the woman and is henceforth her personal property. (Supreme Court of Appeals, 3rd Civil Chamber, 2015\/17417 K.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Jewelry and ornaments given as gifts at a wedding belong to the woman and are considered her personal property. (Supreme Court of Appeals, 2nd Civil Chamber, Decision No. 2017\/9893)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Similar articles that may interest you;<\/mark><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
\n