{"id":7241,"date":"2022-01-31T09:00:00","date_gmt":"2022-01-31T06:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.efeshukuk.com\/?p=7241"},"modified":"2022-02-02T17:30:02","modified_gmt":"2022-02-02T14:30:02","slug":"inanc-sozlesmesi-nedir","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/efeshukuk.com\/en\/inanc-sozlesmesi-nedir\/","title":{"rendered":"What is a Pledge of Faith?"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\u0130nan\u00e7
What is a Pledge of Faith?<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

\u0130nan\u00e7 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi Nedir<\/strong> – \u0130zmir Avukat<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

What is a Pledge of Faith?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Yasal mevzuat\u0131m\u0131z kapsam\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenmemi\u015f olmakla birlikte, uygulamada s\u0131kl\u0131kla kar\u015f\u0131la\u015f\u0131lan inan\u00e7 s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi veya inan\u00e7l\u0131 i\u015flem, inanan ve inan\u0131lan aras\u0131nda yap\u0131lan, taraflar\u0131n hak ve bor\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 belirleyen, inan\u00e7l\u0131 i\u015flemin sona erme sebeplerini ve hak konusu \u015feyin inan\u0131lan taraf\u0131ndan inana geri verilmesini d\u00fczenleyen bir s\u00f6zle\u015fme t\u00fcr\u00fcd\u00fcr. Bir ba\u015fka ifade ile inan\u00e7<\/strong> s\u00f6zle\u015fmeleri, taraflar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 iradelerine uygun bulundu\u011fu i\u00e7in, onlara kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 bor\u00e7 ve sorumluluk y\u00fckleyen ge\u00e7erli s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerdir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u00d6rne\u011fin, yabanc\u0131lar\u0131n gayrimenkul sat\u0131n alamas\u0131n\u0131n s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 oldu\u011fu bir durumda yabanc\u0131 \u00fclke vatanda\u015f\u0131 bir \u015fah\u0131s bir T\u00fcrk vatanda\u015f\u0131 \u00fczerinden gayrimenkul sat\u0131n alarak, bunun kanunen m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmas\u0131 durumunda gayrimenkul\u00fcn kendi \u00fczerine devrine ili\u015fkin bir inan\u00e7l\u0131 i\u015flem s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirebilir. Uygulamada mal ka\u00e7\u0131rma amac\u0131 ile de benzer \u00f6rneklerinin uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131kl\u0131kla g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u0130nan\u00e7 S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi \u0130spat Ko\u015fullar\u0131<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

\u0130nan\u00e7<\/strong>l\u0131 i\u015fleme dayal\u0131 olup dinlenilirli\u011fi kabul edilen iddialar\u0131n ispat\u0131, \u015fekle ba\u011fl\u0131 olmayan yaz\u0131l\u0131 delildir. \u0130nan\u00e7<\/strong> s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi<\/strong> olarak adland\u0131r\u0131lan bu belgenin s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye taraf olanlar\u0131n yada inan\u0131lan\u0131n imzas\u0131n\u0131 i\u00e7ermesi gereklidir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Relevant Supreme Court Decisions<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Supreme Court<\/a> 1. Hukuk Dairesi Esas: 2020\/ 1483 Karar: 2021 \/ 3922<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dava, inan\u00e7<\/strong>l\u0131 i\u015flem hukuki nedenine dayal\u0131 miras pay\u0131 oran\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131lan tapu iptal ve tescil iste\u011fine ili\u015fkindir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

…Somut olayda; dava konusu ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar terekeye g\u00f6re \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015fi konumundaki daval\u0131 …\u2019e onun taraf\u0131ndan da davac\u0131lar gibi miras\u00e7\u0131 olan ve kay\u0131t maliki daval\u0131 …\u2019e devredilmi\u015ftir. B\u00f6yle bir durumda iptal ve tescil iste\u011fi miras\u00e7\u0131lar aras\u0131nda oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in pay oran\u0131nda istekte bulunulabilece\u011finde herhangi bir ku\u015fku bulunmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u00d6te yandan; bilindi\u011fi \u00fczere inan\u00e7<\/strong> s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi<\/strong>, inananla inan\u0131lan aras\u0131nda yap\u0131lan, onlar\u0131n hak ve bor\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 belirleyen, inan\u00e7<\/strong>l\u0131 muamelenin sona erme sebeplerini ve devredilen hakk\u0131n, inan\u0131lan taraf\u0131ndan inanana geri verme (iade) \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131 i\u00e7eren bor\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 bir muameledir. Bu s\u00f6zle\u015fme, taraflar\u0131n\u0131n hak ve bor\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 kapsayan ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z bir akit olup, alacak ve m\u00fclkiyetin naklinin hukuki sebebini te\u015fkil eder.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Taraflar b\u00f6yle bir s\u00f6zle\u015fme ve buna ba\u011fl\u0131 i\u015flemle genellikle, teminat te\u015fkil etmek ve iade edilmek \u00fczere, mal varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na dahil bir \u015fey veya hakk\u0131, ayn\u0131 amac\u0131 g\u00fcden ola\u011fan hukuki muamelelerden daha g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc bir hukuki durum yaratarak, inan\u0131lana inan\u00e7<\/strong>l\u0131 olarak kazand\u0131rmak i\u00e7in ba\u015fvururlar.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Di\u011fer bir anlat\u0131mla, bu i\u015flemle bor\u00e7lu, alacakl\u0131s\u0131na mal\u0131n\u0131 rehin edecek, yani yaln\u0131zca s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 ayni bir hak tan\u0131yacak yerde, mal\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fclkiyetini ge\u00e7irerek rehin hakk\u0131ndan daha g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc, daha ileri giden bir hak tan\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

S\u00f6zle\u015fmenin ve buna ba\u011fl\u0131 temlikin, de\u011finilen bu \u00f6zellikleri nedeniyle, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131 inan\u00e7<\/strong> s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi<\/strong> ile satan kimsenin art\u0131k sadece, \u00f6d\u00fcn\u00e7 alm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu paray\u0131 geri vererek ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n\u0131 kendisine temlik edilmesini istemek yolunda bir alacak hakk\u0131; ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131, inan\u00e7<\/strong> s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi<\/strong> ile alan kimsenin de borcun \u00f6denmesi g\u00fcn\u00fcne kadar ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131 ba\u015fkas\u0131na satmamak ve bor\u00e7 \u00f6denince de geri vermek yolunda yaln\u0131zca bir borcu kalm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Di\u011fer bir bak\u0131\u015f a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131yla ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n m\u00fclkiyeti inan\u0131lana (alacakl\u0131ya) ge\u00e7mi\u015ftir. Ta\u015f\u0131nmazda inanarak satan\u0131n (bor\u00e7lu) m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131 kalmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, al\u0131c\u0131n\u0131n bu m\u00fclkiyet hakk\u0131 \u00fczerinde kurulmu\u015f olan bir rehin hakk\u0131ndan da s\u00f6z edilemez.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bu durumda; gayrimenkul rehni bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ge\u00e7erlili\u011fi olan 4721 s. T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanununun (TMK) 873. maddesinin inan\u00e7<\/strong> s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerine dayal\u0131 temlike konu ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan uygulama yeri olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 da ku\u015fkusuzdur. Nitekim bu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce Hukuk Genel Kurulunun 23.05.1990 g\u00fcn ve l990\/1-202-315 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda da aynen benimsenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bilindi\u011fi gibi, inan\u00e7<\/strong> s\u00f6zle\u015fmeleri, taraflar\u0131n kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 iradelerine uygun bulundu\u011fu i\u00e7in, onlara kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131kl\u0131 bor\u00e7 y\u00fckleyen ve alacak hakk\u0131 veren ge\u00e7erli s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerdir. (818 s. Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu 818 s. Bor\u00e7lar Kanununun (BK). m.; 6098 s. T\u00fcrk Bor\u00e7lar Kanununun (TBK) 97. m.) An\u0131lan s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerde, taraflar, s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin kendilerine y\u00fckledi\u011fi hak ve bor\u00e7lar\u0131 belirlerken, inan\u00e7<\/strong>l\u0131 i\u015flemin sona erme sebeplerini; devredilen hakk\u0131n inan\u0131lan taraf\u0131ndan inanana iade \u015fartlar\u0131n\u0131, bu arada tabii ki s\u00fcresini de belirleyebilirler. Bunun d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda, akde ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131\u015f\u0131n yapt\u0131r\u0131m\u0131na da s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinde yer verebilirler. Buna dair akit h\u00fck\u00fcmleri de TBK’nin 26 ve 27. maddelerine ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k te\u015fkil etmedi\u011fi s\u00fcrece ge\u00e7erli say\u0131l\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u0130nan\u00e7<\/strong> s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi<\/strong>ne ve buna ba\u011fl\u0131 i\u015flemle alacakl\u0131 olan taraf, \u00f6deme g\u00fcn\u00fc gelince alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 elde etmek i\u00e7in dilerse; teminat i\u00e7in temlik edilen \u015feyi \u201c ifa u\u011fruna edim \u201c olarak kendisinde al\u0131koyabilece\u011fi gibi; o \u015feyi, a\u00e7\u0131k art\u0131rma yoluyla veya serbest\u00e7e sat\u0131p sat\u0131\u015f bedelinden alma yoluna da ba\u015fvurabilir. Bu sonu\u00e7lar kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc bu akdin tabiat\u0131nda mevcuttur. S\u00f6zle\u015fme ile \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen ifa s\u00fcresi i\u00e7erisinde, s\u0131rf s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyi imkans\u0131z k\u0131lmak amac\u0131yla muvazaal\u0131 olarak yap\u0131lan temliklerin yasal koruma alt\u0131nda tutulamayaca\u011f\u0131 izahtan varestedir. Meri hukuk sistemimizde herhangi bir d\u00fczenleme olmamas\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131n, inan\u00e7<\/strong> s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinin yukar\u0131da de\u011finilen ilkeler \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde uygulama yeri bulan kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc bir m\u00fcessese oldu\u011fu, \u00f6\u011freti ve uygulamada kabul edilegelen bir olgudur.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u0130nan\u00e7<\/strong> s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinin taraflar\u0131 aras\u0131nda, onlar\u0131n ger\u00e7ek iradelerini ve akitten ama\u00e7lad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 yans\u0131tmas\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ge\u00e7erli oldu\u011fu; taraflar\u0131na Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde nispi haklar\u0131n\u0131 talep etme olana\u011f\u0131n\u0131 verdi\u011fi tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131zd\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Burada \u00fczerinde durulmas\u0131 gereken husus, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz mallar yada \u015fekle ba\u011fl\u0131 akitlerde inan\u00e7<\/strong> s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinin ne gibi hukuki sonu\u00e7 do\u011furaca\u011f\u0131d\u0131r. Di\u011fer bir anlat\u0131mla, s\u00f6zle\u015fmede \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen ko\u015fullar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi halinde, ta\u015f\u0131nmaz m\u00fclkiyetinin naklinin sebebini olu\u015fturup olu\u015fturmayaca\u011f\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bilindi\u011fi \u00fczere; uygulamada mesele, 05.02.1947 tarih 20\/6 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme karar\u0131 ile ili\u015fkilendirilip, bu karar dayanak yap\u0131lmak suretiyle \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcme gidilmektedir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

S\u00f6z konusu kararda; eski hukuka g\u00f6re m\u00fcmk\u00fcn ve ge\u00e7erli olan muvazaa ve nam-\u0131 m\u00fcstear iddialar\u0131n\u0131n, Medeni Kanunun y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden sonra ta\u015f\u0131nmaz mallar hakk\u0131nda dinlenip dinlenemeyece\u011fi tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

An\u0131lan kararda; \u00e7e\u015fitli sebep ve ama\u00e7larla bir ta\u015f\u0131nmaz kayd\u0131na ger\u00e7ek malik yerine ba\u015fka bir nam ve bir s\u00f6zle\u015fmede akitlerden biri yerine \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc bir \u015fahs\u0131n g\u00f6sterilmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011fu, bu gibi hallerde vekilin kendi nam\u0131na ve m\u00fcvekkili hesab\u0131na yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 tasarruflarda oldu\u011fu gibi hukuki bir durum veya herhangi bir maksatla \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc \u015fah\u0131slardan ger\u00e7e\u011fi gizleme gayesi g\u00fcd\u00fclebilece\u011fi, \u201ck\u00f6t\u00fcniyetli ve haks\u0131z gizlemeler\u201d d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda, belirtilen olas\u0131l\u0131klara g\u00f6re a\u00e7\u0131lacak bir davan\u0131n, ger\u00e7ekten, ya mevcut bir hakka dayanarak bir el de\u011fi\u015ftirme veya bir hakk\u0131n korunmas\u0131 niteli\u011fini ta\u015f\u0131yaca\u011f\u0131; bu durumun da, temsil ve vekalet ili\u015fkisinde, m\u00fclkiyette halefiyet esas\u0131 olarak kabul edilmi\u015f bir husus olup, halefiyeti d\u00fczeltme amac\u0131yla \u00f6ncelikle m\u00fclkiyetin vekile aidiyeti d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclse bile, temsil h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fundan bunun korunmas\u0131 ve devam\u0131na h\u00fckmolunamayaca\u011f\u0131, zira TBK’nin 509. maddesindeki \u201cVekilin, kendi ad\u0131na ve vek\u00e2let veren hesab\u0131na g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc i\u015flerden do\u011fan \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filerdeki alaca\u011f\u0131, vek\u00e2let verenin vekile kar\u015f\u0131 b\u00fct\u00fcn bor\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 ifa etti\u011fi anda, kendili\u011finden vek\u00e2let verene ge\u00e7er.\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn bu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnceyi do\u011frulad\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u00f6te yandan gerek ta\u015f\u0131n\u0131r, gerek ta\u015f\u0131nmaz mallara ili\u015fkin olsun nam-\u0131 m\u00fcstear hadiselerinde, meselenin bir istihkak ve m\u00fclkiyet davas\u0131 niteli\u011fini ge\u00e7emeyece\u011finden, ne resmi senet, ne de \u015fekil meselesinin bahse konu olamayaca\u011f\u0131, meselenin akitte ve isimde muvazaay\u0131 kapsam\u0131na alan TBK’nin 19.maddesi kapsam\u0131nda d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclmesinin kanunun amac\u0131na uygun d\u00fc\u015fece\u011fine, de\u011finildikten sonra sonu\u00e7ta, nam-\u0131 m\u00fcstear davalar\u0131n\u0131n dinlenebilir ve yaz\u0131l\u0131 delil ile ispat\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcmk\u00fcn oldu\u011funa, h\u00fckmolunmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 Bile\u015ftirme kararlar\u0131n\u0131n konular\u0131yla s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131, sonu\u00e7lar\u0131yla ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 bulundu\u011fu tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131zd\u0131r. Nam-\u0131 m\u00fcstear i\u00e7in d\u00fczenleme getiren 1947 tarihli karar\u0131n, teminat amac\u0131yla temlike dair inan\u00e7<\/strong> s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerini kapsad\u0131\u011f\u0131 da ku\u015fkusuzdur. Uygulamada an\u0131lan s\u00f6zle\u015fmeler gerek \u00f6z\u00fc, gerek i\u015fleyi\u015fi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan, genelde muvazaa, \u00f6zelde ise nam-\u0131 m\u00fcstear ba\u015fl\u0131klar\u0131 alt\u0131nda nitelendirilegelmektedir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Belirtilen \u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme Karar\u0131nda da de\u011finildi\u011fi \u00fczere; inan\u00e7<\/strong> s\u00f6zle\u015fmeleri bir yandan m\u00fclkiyeti nakil borcu do\u011furmas\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan taraflar\u0131 ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131, di\u011fer yandan, m\u00fclkiyetin naklinin sebebini te\u015fkil etmesi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan tasarruf i\u015flemlerini b\u00fcnyesinde bar\u0131nd\u0131ran s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerdir. Bu durumda ko\u015fullar\u0131n olu\u015fmas\u0131 halinde ta\u015f\u0131nmaz m\u00fclkiyetini nakil \u00f6zelli\u011fini ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 kabul edilmelidir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme karar\u0131n\u0131n sonu\u00e7 b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde ifade olundu\u011fu \u00fczere, inan\u00e7<\/strong>l\u0131 i\u015fleme dayal\u0131 olup dinlenilirli\u011fi kabul edilen iddialar\u0131n ispat\u0131, \u015fekle ba\u011fl\u0131 olmayan yaz\u0131l\u0131 delildir. \u0130nan\u00e7<\/strong> s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi<\/strong> olarak adland\u0131r\u0131lan bu belgenin s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye taraf olanlar\u0131n yada inan\u0131lan\u0131n imzas\u0131n\u0131 i\u00e7ermesi gereklidir. Bunun d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki bir kabul, hem \u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme karar\u0131n\u0131n kapsam\u0131n\u0131n geni\u015fletilmesi, hemde ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n tapu d\u0131\u015f\u0131 sat\u0131\u015flar\u0131na olanak sa\u011flamak anlam\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yaca\u011f\u0131ndan kendine \u00f6zg\u00fc bu s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerle ba\u011fda\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lamaz.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bunun yan\u0131nda; hukukumuzda di\u011fer \u00e7a\u011fda\u015f hukuk sistemlerinde oldu\u011fu gibi ki\u015filerin huzur ve g\u00fcven i\u00e7erisinde al\u0131\u015f veri\u015fte bulunmalar\u0131, sat\u0131n ald\u0131klar\u0131 \u015feylerin ilerde kendilerinden al\u0131nabilece\u011fi endi\u015felerini ta\u015f\u0131mamalar\u0131, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla toplum d\u00fczenini sa\u011flama d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesiyle, alan ki\u015finin iyi niyetinin korunmas\u0131 ilkesi kabul edilmi\u015ftir. Bu ama\u00e7la 4721 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu’nun (TMK) 2. maddesinin genel h\u00fckm\u00fc yan\u0131nda menkul mallarda 988. ve 989. maddelerinin ve tapulu ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n el de\u011fi\u015ftirmesinde ise 1023. maddesinin \u00f6zel h\u00fck\u00fcmleri getirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tapulu ta\u015f\u0131nmazlar\u0131n intikallerinde, huzur ve g\u00fcveni koruma, toplum d\u00fczenini sa\u011flama u\u011fruna tapu kayd\u0131nda ismi ge\u00e7meyen ama as\u0131l malik olan\u0131n hakk\u0131 feda edildi\u011finden, iktisapta bulunan ki\u015finin iyi niyetli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tam olarak tespiti b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131maktad\u0131r. Ger\u00e7ekten, bir yanda tapu sicilinin do\u011frulu\u011funa inanarak iktisapta bulundu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcren kimse, di\u011fer yanda ise kendisi i\u00e7in maddi hatta baz\u0131 hallerde manevi b\u00fcy\u00fck de\u011fer ta\u015f\u0131yan ayni hakk\u0131n\u0131 yitirme tehlikesi ile kar\u015f\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131ya kalan \u00f6nceki malik bulunmaktad\u0131r. Bu nedenle y\u00fczeysel ve \u015fekilci bir ara\u015ft\u0131rma ve yakla\u015f\u0131m\u0131n b\u00fcy\u00fck ma\u011fduriyetlere yol a\u00e7aca\u011f\u0131, ki\u015filerin Devlete ve adalete olan g\u00fcven ve sayg\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 sarsaca\u011f\u0131 ve yasa koyucunun amac\u0131n\u0131n ilk bak\u0131\u015fta \u015feklen iyi niyetli g\u00f6z\u00fckeni de\u011fil ger\u00e7ekten iyi niyetli olan ki\u015fiyi korumak oldu\u011fu hususlar\u0131n\u0131n daima g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde tutulmas\u0131, bu y\u00f6nde t\u00fcm delillerin toplan\u0131p derinli\u011fine irdelenmesi ve de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nitekim bu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015ften hareketle, “k\u00f6t\u00fc niyet iddias\u0131n\u0131n def’i de\u011fil itiraz oldu\u011fu, iddia ve m\u00fcdafaan\u0131n geni\u015fletilmesi yasa\u011f\u0131na tabii olmaks\u0131z\u0131n her zaman ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclebilece\u011fi ve mahkemece kendili\u011finden (resen) nazara al\u0131naca\u011f\u0131” ilkeleri 8.11.1991 tarih 1990\/4 esas 1991\/3 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130nan\u00e7lar<\/strong>\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme Karar\u0131nda kabul edilmi\u015f, bilimsel g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fler de ayn\u0131 do\u011frultuda geli\u015fmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hemen belirtmek gerekir ki, yukar\u0131da belirtilen ilkelere g\u00f6re inan\u00e7<\/strong>l\u0131 i\u015flem iddias\u0131 yaz\u0131l\u0131 delille ispat edilmesi gerekir ise de; somut olayda inan\u00e7<\/strong>l\u0131 i\u015flem ile kendisine temlik yap\u0131lan ilk el daval\u0131 …\u2019in, gerek dosyaya sundu\u011fu dilek\u00e7e, gerekse duru\u015fmadaki temlikin inan\u00e7<\/strong>l\u0131 i\u015flem ile yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki a\u00e7\u0131k beyan\u0131, maddi olgu olarak inan\u00e7<\/strong>l\u0131 i\u015flem iddias\u0131n\u0131 ispat i\u00e7in yeterlidir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

B\u00f6yle bir durumda, ilk el …den devralan daval\u0131 …, mirasb\u0131rakan\u0131n miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131ndan oldu\u011funa g\u00f6re, durumu bilen ya da bilmesi gereken ki\u015fi oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in iyiniyetli temlik ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131nda bulunmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Kald\u0131 ki; ilk el …, inan\u00e7<\/strong>l\u0131 i\u015flemin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kabul ederken daval\u0131 …\u2019e yap\u0131lan temlikin de inan\u00e7<\/strong>l\u0131 i\u015flemle yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmektedir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hal b\u00f6yle olunca, davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekirken yan\u0131lg\u0131l\u0131 de\u011ferlendirme ile yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde karar verilmesi do\u011fru de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sonu\u00e7: Davac\u0131lar …, …, …, …, …\u2019un yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclen temyiz itiraz\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK’n\u0131n 371\/1-a maddesi gere\u011fince Gaziantep B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 1. Hukuk Dairesi karar\u0131n\u0131n BOZULMASINA, HMK’n\u0131n 373\/2. maddesi gere\u011fince dosyan\u0131n karar\u0131 veren Gaziantep B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 1. Hukuk Dairesine g\u00f6nderilmesine, al\u0131nan pe\u015fin harc\u0131n temyiz edene geri verilmesine, 14\/09\/2021 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle kesin olarak karar verildi. (\u00a4\u00a4)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

You may also be interested in the following studies:;<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
\n