{"id":7112,"date":"2022-01-10T09:00:00","date_gmt":"2022-01-10T06:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.efeshukuk.com\/?p=7112"},"modified":"2022-01-14T21:46:33","modified_gmt":"2022-01-14T18:46:33","slug":"tereke-nedir","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/efeshukuk.com\/en\/tereke-nedir\/","title":{"rendered":"What is an inheritance?"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"Tereke
What is an inheritance?<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Tereke Nedir | \u0130zmir Avukat<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/a><\/figure>
\n

estate<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

isim, hukuk, Arap\u00e7a<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Inheritance<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

Tereke Nedir? Miras hukuku s\u00fcre\u00e7lerinde s\u0131kl\u0131kla kar\u015f\u0131la\u015f\u0131lan tereke kelime anlam\u0131 olarak miras anlam\u0131na gelmekte olup; hukuk s\u00fcre\u00e7lerinde miras b\u0131rakan\u0131n alacak ve bor\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fc anlam\u0131na gelmektedir. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Terekenin Tespiti <\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Mirasb\u0131rakan\u0131n sahip oldu\u011fu malvarl\u0131\u011f\u0131, terekenin tespiti denen bir dava ile tespit edilebilir. Konuya ili\u015fkin detayl\u0131 bilgi i\u00e7in “Estate Determination Case<\/span><\/a>” yaz\u0131m\u0131z\u0131 inceleyebilirsiniz.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Relevant Supreme Court Decisions<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Terekenin Borca Bat\u0131kl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Davas\u0131 A\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f \u0130se Murise Kar\u015f\u0131 A\u00e7\u0131lan Tazminat Davas\u0131 Beklenir<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Supreme Court<\/strong> 21. Hukuk Dairesi<\/strong> E. 2015\/8688<\/strong> K. 2015\/17095<\/strong><\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

4721 Say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanununun 605<\/a>. maddesinin 2. F\u0131kras\u0131 \u201c\u00d6l\u00fcm\u00fc halinde miras b\u0131rakan\u0131n \u00f6demeden aczi a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belli veya resmen tespit edilmi\u015f ise, miras reddedilmi\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r.\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fcne amirdir. Bu h\u00fck\u00fcm bir karinedir. Miras\u0131n h\u00fckmen reddi bir s\u00fcreye tabi olmay\u0131p, miras\u00e7\u0131lar, alacakl\u0131lara kar\u015f\u0131 a\u00e7acaklar\u0131 tespit davas\u0131 ile terekenin borca bat\u0131k<\/strong> oldu\u011funun tespitini her zaman isteyebilecekleri gibi, miras\u00e7\u0131lara kar\u015f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lacak davada defi olarak da her zaman terekenin borca bat\u0131k<\/strong> oldu\u011fu ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclebilirler. Somut olayda, daval\u0131 def’i yolunu tercih etmi\u015ftir. A\u00e7\u0131lan bu davada miras b\u0131rakan\u0131n \u00f6demeden aciz oldu\u011funu dile getirilmi\u015ftir. \u0130\u015fte bu halde miras\u0131n reddedilmi\u015f oldu\u011funun kabul\u00fc gerekir. Bu nedenle de D\u00fcriye ve R.. E.. taraf\u0131ndan davaya kar\u015f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen terekenin borca bat\u0131k<\/strong> oldu\u011funa ili\u015fkin bu savunman\u0131n hadise (\u00f6n sorun) \u015feklinde incelenip karara ba\u011flanmas\u0131 gereklidir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Terekenin Borca Bat\u0131k Oldu\u011funu Tespit Etmekte Asliye Hukuk G\u00f6revlidir<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Supreme Court<\/strong> 14. Hukuk Dairesi<\/strong> E. 2015\/ 2918 K. 2016\/ 4100<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Miras\u0131n h\u00fckmen reddi davas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6zelli\u011fi gere\u011fi \u00f6l\u00fcm tarihinde murisin \u00f6demeden aczi a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belli veya resmen tespit edilmi\u015f ise, miras reddedilmi\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r (TMK m. 605\/2). Miras\u00e7\u0131lar T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanununun 610. maddesinde yaz\u0131l\u0131 ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k da bulunmad\u0131k\u00e7a yani z\u0131mnen miras\u0131 kabul etmi\u015f duruma d\u00fc\u015fm\u00fc\u015f olmad\u0131k\u00e7a her zaman murisin \u00f6demeden aczinin tespitini isteyebilir. T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanununun 606. maddesinde belirtilen s\u00fcre bu davada uygulanmaz. Dava alacakl\u0131lara husumet y\u00f6neltilerek g\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcr. Bu davada yetkili mahkeme ise alacakl\u0131lar\u0131n davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 zamandaki ikametgah\u0131 mahkemesidir. Ayr\u0131ca TMK’n\u0131n Velayet, Vesayet ve Miras H\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin Uygulanmas\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin T\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn 39\/2 bendi gere\u011fince miras\u0131n reddi yetkisini i\u00e7eren \u00f6zel vekaletname sunulmas\u0131 zorunludur.
28.05.2014 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 6502 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcketicinin Korunmas\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun her t\u00fcrl\u00fc t\u00fcketici i\u015flemi ile t\u00fcketiciye y\u00f6nelik uygulamalar\u0131 kapsamaktad\u0131r.
Bir davada olaylar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamak taraflara, hukuki nitelendirme hakime aittir (HMK m. 33). Dava dilek\u00e7esi i\u00e7eri\u011fine g\u00f6re dava, \u00f6l\u00fcm tarihinde murisin \u00f6demeden aczinin tespiti iste\u011fine ili\u015fkindir (TMK m. 605\/2). Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k davac\u0131lar\u0131n miras\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k s\u0131fat\u0131ndan do\u011fan bir davad\u0131r. 6502 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcketcinin Korunmas\u0131 Hakk\u0131nda Kanun, sadece t\u00fcketici i\u015flemleriyle t\u00fcketicilere y\u00f6nelik uygulamalar\u0131 kapsamaktad\u0131r. G\u00f6r\u00fclmekte olan davada ise 6502 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun uygulamas\u0131 ile ilgili bir ihlilaf s\u00f6z konusu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi bu t\u00fcr uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klarda t\u00fcketici mahkemesinin g\u00f6revli oldu\u011fu konusunda bir d\u00fczenleme de bulunmamaktad\u0131r.
23.12.1942 g\u00fcnl\u00fc ve 24\/29 say\u0131l\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay \u0130\u00e7tihad\u0131 Birle\u015ftirme Karar\u0131na g\u00f6re, miras\u0131n h\u00fckmen reddi davas\u0131nda g\u00f6revli mahkeme bor\u00e7 miktar\u0131na g\u00f6re belirlenir. Davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihten \u00f6nce y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 Hukuk Muhakemeleri Kanunu ise asliye hukuk ve sulh hukuk mahkemesinin g\u00f6revli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 tayin ve tespitte dava konusunun de\u011feri ve miktar\u0131 \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcs\u00fcn\u00fc kald\u0131rm\u0131\u015f, dava konusunun de\u011fer ve miktar\u0131na bak\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n malvarl\u0131\u011f\u0131 haklar\u0131na ili\u015fkin davalarda, g\u00f6revli mahkemenin aksine bir d\u00fczenleme bulunmad\u0131k\u00e7a asliye hukuk mahkemesi oldu\u011fu h\u00fckme ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r (HMK m. 2\/1).
Kanunda bu konuda aksine bir d\u00fczenleme bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na g\u00f6re, terekenin borca bat\u0131k oldu\u011funun tespitine ili\u015fkin davalarda asliye hukuk mahkemesi g\u00f6revlidir. G\u00f6rev, kamu d\u00fczenine ili\u015fkin olup, mahkemece yarg\u0131laman\u0131n her a\u015famas\u0131nda kendili\u011finden dikkate al\u0131nmas\u0131 zorunludur.
<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Other studies on inheritance law that may interest you:;<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
\n