{"id":5116,"date":"2021-05-06T09:00:00","date_gmt":"2021-05-06T06:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.efeshukuk.com\/?p=5116"},"modified":"2021-06-24T08:41:01","modified_gmt":"2021-06-24T05:41:01","slug":"teksif-ilkesi-nedir","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/efeshukuk.com\/en\/teksif-ilkesi-nedir\/","title":{"rendered":"What is the Concentration Principle?"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"teksif
What is the Concentration Principle?<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n

What is the Concentration Principle? | Legal Information | Law Firm | Lawyer in Izmir <\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>
\n

concentrate<\/p>\n\n\n\n

noun, archaic, (teksi:fi), Arabic teks\u0331\u012bf<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Intensification, thickening, darkening.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

The parties must present the facts, claims, and defenses they rely on within the scope of the proceedings, within a specific timeframe and within the limits stipulated by law. Facts and evidence presented outside this timeframe are, as a rule, not accepted as evidence by the court. After submitting a reply to the defendant's response, the plaintiff cannot expand or change their claim without the defendant's consent. Similarly, after submitting a second response to the court, the defendant cannot expand or change their claims and defenses without the plaintiff's consent. An exception to this rule is the amendment of the claim.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Law No. 6100 on Civil Procedure<\/span><\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Article 25-<\/strong> (1) Except for the exceptions provided for in the law, the judge cannot spontaneously take into account things or facts not stated by either party and cannot even engage in behavior that might remind them of such things. (2) Except for the situations specified in the law, the judge cannot spontaneously collect evidence.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Article 141-<\/strong> (1) The parties may freely expand or change their claims or defenses with reply and second reply petitions. Claims or defenses cannot be expanded or changed after the mutual exchange of petitions. (2) The provisions regarding amendment and the explicit consent of the opposing party are reserved for expanding and changing claims and defenses.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

SUPREME COURT<\/strong> 9th LAW DIVISION<\/strong> E. 2017\/109<\/strong> K. 2017\/64<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HKM’n\u0131n 25. maddesine g\u00f6re Kanunda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen istisnalar d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda, h\u00e2kim, iki taraftan birinin s\u00f6ylemedi\u011fi \u015feyi veya vak\u0131alar\u0131 kendili\u011finden dikkate alamayaca\u011f\u0131ndan (teksif ilkesi- maddi vak\u0131a ile ba\u011fl\u0131l\u0131k) davac\u0131n\u0131n iddaa etmedi\u011fi “herg\u00fcn 1,5 saat daha fazla \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma” oldu\u011funun kabul\u00fc an\u0131lan ilkeye ayk\u0131r\u0131d\u0131r.” gerek\u00e7esi ile bozulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For your legal disputes, contact us. Contact <\/span><\/a>page.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

You may also be interested in the following studies:;<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
\n